|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by andrew_rickman,
févr. 2, 2000
Pros: none
Cons: bad graphics/ bad/annoying sounds/ bad quality
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by jbran4,
mars 2, 2000
Pros: Could last a long time
Cons: Worthless details
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by Eurythmic,
févr. 28, 2000
Pros: You can see what the designers had in mind. They almost got it right.
Cons: Unrealistic frequency of natural disasters, combat can't be avoided, religion system poorly done
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by seacow,
juin 18, 2001
Pros: Average graphics
Cons: difficult to play
The Bottom Line: SimCity + Age of Empires, only more so.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by charivarius,
mars 16, 2001
Pros: free from bugs, cheap
Cons: crummy gameplay, unchallenging, long levels, repetitive music score
The Bottom Line: If you liked "SimCity" or "Populous," check this game out! If you're looking to branch out after StarCraft, AOE II, or Civ II, don't waste your time or money.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by bradb12,
déc. 3, 1999
Pros: High enjoyment factor
Cons: tough to go from level to level
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by gulag49,
avr. 9, 2000
Pros: good promises
Cons: nothing done for them
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by abedelia,
avr. 13, 2000
Pros: Good graphics
Cons: Much easier than Caesar II
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by thepremier,
oct. 5, 2001
Pros: Strategy and realism.
Cons: Finicky rating system makes advancing difficult.
The Bottom Line: It is a terrific bargain nowadays, and should challenge and entertain simulation / strategy fans.
|
|
|
Note de l'auteur :
|
|
|
by Beefbob,
déc. 22, 2000
Pros: better random selections (previously alternated)
Cons: Battles aren't as good as Caesar II :(
|
|